Canelo Alvarez Branded a “Disgrace to Boxing” as Berlanga, Charlo Fight Reports Spark Outrage Among Fans
canelo’s Controversial Fight Decisions
Canelo Alvarez is at the center of a firestorm, and it’s not for the reasons you might expect. Fresh off a unanimous decision victory over Jaime Munguia in May, the Mexican boxing legend faces intense backlash over the potential choices for his next fight. Fans are clamoring for a showdown with his WBC mandatory, David Benavidez, but recent reports suggest Canelo might instead face WBA No.1 contender Edgar Berlanga or former middleweight champion Jermall Charlo. This has left many fans infuriated and questioning Canelo’s legacy.
A Disputed Path
While other contenders like William Scull, Canelo’s IBF mandatory challenger, wait in the wings, it was a tweet from ESPN’s Salvador Rodriguez that ignited the controversy. Shared on X by talkSport editor Michael Benson, the update suggested Berlanga or Charlo are more likely opponents. This news quickly soured the mood among boxing enthusiasts.
Earlier today, Benson wrote on X, “Canelo Alvarez’s next fight reportedly could be vs Edgar Berlanga or Jermall Charlo – Sept 14th remains a possible date, though he may end up fighting a few weeks later.” However, there are significant issues with this update. Firstly, Jermall Charlo, who faced Canelo’s twin brother last September, has hinted at retiring from the sport. Secondly, ESPN’s Mike Coppinger suggested that Canelo might skip Mexican Independence Day due to UFC 306 and might fight later in the year as a tune-up for a bout with Terence Crawford next year, orchestrated by His Excellency Turki Alalshikh.
Fan Outrage
Regardless of the contradictory reports, Benson’s tweet unleashed a wave of outrage. Fans are exasperated at the thought of Canelo sidestepping Benavidez. Here’s a taste of the backlash:
“Canelo fighting nobodies but people still think he the face of boxing and top 5 p4p,” tweeted @A5Reallyhim, reflecting a sentiment shared by many.
@chriscutaneo1 was equally blunt: “Or Charlo lmfao.. dude is just fighting anyone now at this point other than Benavidez.”
One of the harshest criticisms came from @the3els: “If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck…”
Another fan, @thefan763922, didn’t mince words, calling Canelo “a disgrace to Boxing.”
The sentiment was echoed by @Czargip, who declared, “Lame, will skip it, just like the last 2.”
View this post on Instagram
Canelo’s Perspective
Despite the harsh criticism, Canelo Alvarez remains a titan in the sport. His resume boasts victories over some of the best, including Floyd Mayweather, Gennady Golovkin, Miguel Cotto, Shane Mosley, and Dmitry Bivol. His decision to potentially fight Berlanga or Charlo is seen by some as a strategic move rather than a cop-out. In a sport where career longevity and financial security are paramount, Canelo’s choices might reflect a broader strategy to maximize his earning potential while preserving his legacy.
The Complexity of Legacy
Canelo Alvarez’s legacy is a complex tapestry of triumphs and controversies. While he’s undeniably one of the greatest boxers of his generation, his decision-making regarding opponents has often sparked debate. Fans want to see him tested against the very best, and for many, David Benavidez represents that ultimate challenge. Avoiding Benavidez, in their eyes, tarnishes Canelo’s standing as the face of boxing.
Editor’s Note
As we delve into the intricacies of Canelo Alvarez’s career choices, it’s essential to consider the multifaceted nature of boxing as both a sport and a business. Canelo’s legacy, while subject to scrutiny, is built on a foundation of remarkable achievements. Yet, the passion of the fans who feel let down is a testament to the high expectations placed on boxing’s greatest stars.
